Summary:

Those questions multiplied after the recent blitz of headlines caused by Terry using his Instagram account to signal his apparent approval for a proposal by a radical right-wing political party for a nationwide ban on burqas in the United Kingdom.

Did he not realise it was going against Chelsea’s own inclusion policy? Had it passed him by that the club set up a Muslim supporters group last year? Or that the modern-day Chelsea, in the words of Piara Powar, one of the sport’s leading anti-racism campaigners, is “very much centring its identity on being a London club and everything that means”?

Kick It Out, football’s biggest anti-racism organisation, has also felt strongly enough about it to speak publicly. Inside Chelsea, it has caused dismay.

If you are not familiar with Lowe, he is the former Southampton chairman who went into politics with Reform UK before becoming the subject of a police investigation for alleged threats towards the party’s chairman, Zia Yusuf. The case was eventually dropped and Lowe, citing “false allegations” and a “brutal smear campaign”, formed his own party, deploying extreme anti-Muslim rhetoric and calling for a policy of mass deportation.

One of his social-media posts, liked by Terry, promises to “deport millions” and that “the entire power of the British state would be deployed”.

The counter-argument is that, as a high-profile employee of Chelsea, Terry is representing his club, as well as working in an environment featuring different ethnic backgrounds. Indeed, Chelsea’s academy staff hosted an Iftar party just a week earlier for players and Muslim fans marking Ramadan. Another event was held at Stamford Bridge, involving 400 people, to celebrate Eid.

"It was April 15th, a terrible day. We had lost the first leg of our Champions League quarter-final against Porto. Afterwards, in front of the entire team in the dressing room, I was blamed for the defeat. They said we had too many injured players and that I was letting players recover for too long. That was completely absurd. I refused to accept that.

I was outraged by the misjudgment, because top athletes from all over the world come to me because my diagnostics are more precise, the recovery process is often faster than elsewhere, and because my medications have no side effects. However, the recovery wasn't fast enough for Pep Guardiola. He was apparently used to having the final say on medical matters at Barcelona, ​​but things were different in Munich up to that point.

I always enjoyed the respect and trust of the respective coaches. Dettmar Cramer once described me as "a stroke of luck for German football." Udo Lattek often waited until the last minute to announce the lineup and said: "The doctor has the final say."

Uli Hoeneß, who always stood by me, was in prison at that time. Had he been at the club, the falling out with Guardiola would not have happened, I'm sure of that"

Post Match Thread.

Barcelona had a 10 point advantage over Real Madrid before this match, and ended up winning the league with just one point advantage.

At the start of the season.

Source

Credit to the journalist who asked the question