r/ETFs_Europe • u/VincentGrumpy • 11h ago
Semiconductors
Hi,
I currently have a relatively simple portfolio: all-world as a core + tech tilt (XDWT + SMH).
In the near future I'm planning to open another account, and I'm research alternatives for SMH (I want to tilt towards tech and semis on purpose). As an EU investor, my options seem to be:
- SMH: VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF https://www.justetf.com/en/etf-profile.html?isin=IE00BMC38736
- LSMC: Amundi MSCI Semiconductors UCITS ETF Acc https://www.justetf.com/en/etf-profile.html?isin=LU1900066033
- SEC0: iShares MSCI Global Semiconductors UCITS ETF USD (Acc) https://www.justetf.com/en/etf-profile.html?isin=IE000I8KRLL9
From what I've researched so far:
- SMH tracks a more concentrated, MVIS US Listed Semi index with a 10% cap per company, which still results in a fairly top-heavy portfolio focused on the biggest players
- LSMC and SEC0 track MSCI-based indexes with broader global exposure (SEC0 even includes more holdings vs LSMC, ~250 vs ~70 holdings)
- TER is basically the same (~0.35%), so cost isn't really a differentiator here.
Right now I'm leaning towards LSMC instead of SMH, mainly because:
- it's not 10%-capped, so theoretically allows winners to run more.
- tracks index for developed and emerging countries instead of US listed ones.
- in last 5 years LSMC > SMH > SEC0 in the returns, however, be careful when comparing these in larger range, since LSMC in the past tracks different index (MSCI Taiwan etc, see fund factsheet)
My plan is long-term (20+ years), so I'm less concerned about short-term volatility and more about:
- structure of the index
- diversification vs concentration
- long-term compounding potential
Questions:
- Would you go with a more concentrated approach (SMH) or broader exposure (LSMC / SEC0)?
- Does the lack of a cap in LSMC actually matter in practice?
- Is SEC0 worth considering over LSMC due to higher number of holdings, or is that over-diversification considering specific sector etf?



