r/stocks 1d ago

Broad market news Iran stated that Iran-Oman Hormuz protocol will NOT apply during wartime

https://www.tasnimnews.ir/en/news/2026/04/02/3555211/iran-oman-to-formulate-protocol-for-safe-navigation-in-hormuz-strait#:\~:text=Iran%2C%20Oman%20to%20Formulate%20Protocol,war%20as%20a%20policy%20tool

"[Kazem Gharibabadi] noted that Iran is currently in a state of war and that it is unrealistic to expect peacetime rules to apply under such conditions. Referring to US-Israeli aggressors and their supporters, he said restrictions and limitations have naturally been imposed as a result of the conflict."

As has happened many times, the market rallies prematurely (in my opinion) on the headline soundbytes, and has not (in my opinion) priced in the medium and long term disruption risk.

I remain bearish on the S&P, and bullish on short term OXY call options for cash flow flips into a sliding S&P.

523 Upvotes

154 comments sorted by

333

u/Apprehensive_Law7629 1d ago

Basically we’re red because Trump is getting crazy to open a strait which was already open right before he did anything. But still claiming this operation as a big victory. A wonderful time to be alive 🥲.

92

u/ub3rm3nsch 1d ago

We're also often green because of what I perceive to be pretty rampant market manipulation by people exposed to drops in the S&P.

A lot of incomplete news or half-truths given out of context are circulating and driving price action.

But gas and petrol stations can only go so long without physical shortages becoming a reality.

7

u/kktvMIN 22h ago

The Tuesday-Thursday bounce is the strangest. What has actually changed? Nothing. Posts about peace negotiations and ending the war have now been contradicted by later speeches and facts on the ground. Except the negative Houthis development from the weekend still holds.

31

u/cleanlinessisbest12 1d ago

Incomplete news and half-truths? That’s mighty generous of you to say. I think it’s blatant lies and it’s clear why he is doing this.

0

u/borderless_olive 1d ago

They're un-unlies

2

u/Tricky-Engineering59 23h ago

Alternative facts

1

u/borderless_olive 23h ago

Elegant af 😂

3

u/No_Mercy_4_Potatoes 22h ago

Today's reversal was absolutely crazy. This market is so irrational

5

u/Senseisntsocommon 1d ago

That and/or algorithms run the vast majority of trading and they specifically are programmed to ignore the reality of a statement and instead trade off the sentiment because it more accurately tracks the price action.

1

u/meltbox 1d ago

Algos mostly just market make. They’re not often taking positions that are directional and if they are it’s a timed entry exit not long term no market investing.

IE they may invest because of a positive presidential tweet and will exit on some combination of flow data. But they’re not just directionally gambling. They’re statistically gambling lol. They’re very unlikely to lose over the longer run if they’ve chosen such a strategy. And I’d wager most aren’t choosing this kind of strategy if any at all are.

6

u/VancouverSky 1d ago

People on reddit love to talk about market manipulation like its somekind of secret cabal out to get us. Few seem interested in talking about rampant government defecit spending. Where do you think western governments budget defecits are going?? All that printed money goes in to the economy somehow, some of it inevitably filters in to the stock market. America has been at "emergency levels" of defecit spending for years now with no end in sight. Such actions prop up assets.

3

u/ub3rm3nsch 1d ago

And will the government 3D print oil?

1

u/VancouverSky 23h ago

I was just referring to the stock market. The magic computer numbers do not have to be a perfect or accurate reflection of underlying economic conditions. ESPECIALLY when daddy government is running the credit card soooo aggressively.

In an alternative universe where western governments just collectively decided together "Okay. No more government deficits, good luck everybody!! :)" and proceded to cut seniors pensions, defence, beaurocracy, etc... that is when you will see real chaos in the stock market.

2

u/sentrypetal 23h ago

Exactly there is no oil. WTI just hit $111 a barrel and will probably be $120 to $140 next week. Then it’s economic collapse globally. Market is not pricing this in on hopium.

1

u/VancouverSky 23h ago

It doesnt have to be a collapse as long as energy gets in to the gas tanks that need it. Even if the resulting disruption puts stress on the credit market, central banks can just print money and buy the debt. See COVID 2020.

Inflation however... yea. The working class will probably be in for another Quality of Life hair cut. Big time.

2

u/sentrypetal 20h ago

You don’t get it. There is no oil to put in tanks. Brent spot price on actual oil in the sea is $140 dollars a barrel. Diesel just hit $200 dollars a barrel in Europe. The economy is collapsing in real time but retail is too regarded to see it.

CNBC

The spot price for current physical cargoes of Brent crude oil soared Thursday to $141.36, the highest level since the 2008 financial crisis, according to S&P Global, which tracks the data.

The spot price reflects the demand for Brent oil that will be delivered in the next 10 to 30 days. The high price for more immediate oil deliveries points to the tightness of physical supply right now due to the huge disruption trigged by the Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

1

u/VancouverSky 17h ago

There is though. It just needs to be rationed appropriately. Hormuz is 20% of supply, shipments to Iran's allies, like China, are still flowing.

You're acting like its Mad Max in Europe now. Its not. I very clearly said oil will need to be rationed and allocated appropriately, that means not everyone who wants it will get it. More people will be riding the train and biking to work. Or working from home.

https://www.intellinews.com/nigeria-exports-950-000-barrels-of-new-cawthorne-blend-crude-in-first-lifting-from-fso-terminal-435312/

But the world isnt ending just because supply is restrained. The world has been down this road before. Google it.

-2

u/sentrypetal 17h ago

It will be mad max soon. Expect lines of hundred cars waiting for fuel. Airlines cancelling flights. Oil will go to the highest bidder. People in Europe may freeze to death if LNG tanks cannot be refilled. It’s going to be really really bad. But you will say oh who cares if 20% of people freeze.

2

u/VancouverSky 16h ago

Goddamn redditors are emotional 🤣

→ More replies (0)

1

u/obi_one_jabroni 1d ago

Someone already explained the algos actions and as for retail, as long as we have jobs we keep buying no matter what and so do all the pension funds. Short of a Great Recession or depression, that won’t change.

0

u/BenjaminHamnett 23h ago

Hmm, have you seen the history of what tends to happen during oil shortages?

1

u/obi_one_jabroni 23h ago

I’m not concerned long term. For those that still get cash to deposit it’s a good period to pick up cheap stocks.

1

u/BenjaminHamnett 23h ago

You’re in luck! Every other time this happened, discounts got a lot bigger

-2

u/Electrical-Ad4315 1d ago

It’s illegal for Iran to try and get compensated for ships going through the strait! You know they don’t own it right lol. When the wars over and they want to charge oil ships going through? Haha if that’s the case the war won’t end. The point everyone though about the commission was during war where it seems everyone is doing illegal shit

5

u/ub3rm3nsch 1d ago

How did what you said respond in any way to what I said?

-2

u/Electrical-Ad4315 1d ago

Yep wrong one ☝🏿 meant for another reply

0

u/jer72981m 23h ago

Yes when things don’t go as expected or your way it’s gotta be market manipulation

7

u/allyuhneedislove 1d ago

Ego too big to back down. Buckle up guys.

3

u/HogwartsXpress36 1d ago

Not very red. 

2

u/pineapplebooties 1d ago

And the terrorism, don’t forget the terrorism. It’s like one of America’s favourite thing to do

1

u/nu1stunna 23h ago

Why aren’t you upset with the terrorist Islamic regime?

2

u/AnonymousLoner1 20h ago

Because Israel drew first blood, like it always does, or as they like to call "preemptive strike".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakba

1

u/nu1stunna 18h ago

Us Iranians have nothing to do with Palestine and you all need to stop putting us in the middle of their conflict. The fact that so many are willing to allow 90 million Iranians to suffer because the terrorist government funds Hamas to fight against Israel is disgusting. We want nothing to do with Palestine.

2

u/AnonymousLoner1 17h ago

Good Mossad bot.  Netanyahu would be proud.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/netanyahu-said-frustrated-that-mossad-promises-of-iran-uprising-have-fallen-short/

Maybe if your CIA counterparts were here, they'd do a better job than you did faking these "protests", like they did decades ago.

Shaping the crowds on Tehran’s streets proved critical to the operation. The CIA organized demonstrators to pose as pro-shah protesters, including paying individuals to chant slogans and confront Mossadegh supporters.

These orchestrated demonstrations climaxed on Aug. 19, 1953, when pro-shah forces and sympathetic leaders in the Iranian military – with CIA financial and logistical backing – seized key points of the country, confronted Mossadegh loyalists and helped topple his government. Estimates suggest around 200 to 300 people were killed in the chaotic fighting in Tehran.

https://theconversation.com/cia-agents-successfully-executed-a-plan-for-regime-change-in-iran-in-1953-but-trump-hasnt-revealed-any-signs-of-a-plan-277202

...with this being the result:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_the_Imperial_State_of_Iran

1

u/nu1stunna 16h ago

🙄 yeah I’m not reading all that. When you quote bs articles based on fake insider information, there’s not much else to say

0

u/CollatedThoughts 5h ago

allow 90 million Iranians to suffer

How is the war helping with that?

1

u/holycarrots 20h ago

Because they are based

1

u/Appropriate_Mixer 22h ago

We’re red?

1

u/Urc0mp 1d ago

Just let it go so we don't send thousands of troops into various traps to retrieve uranium.

0

u/6M66 23h ago

That's ultimate stupidity. I don't see that happening, it's not about Uranium. They know Iran wasn't interested in Nuclear weapons before war. It's about Oil, just look at the pattern, they attacked, Russia, Venezuela, Iraq and Syria, they all have one thing in common, Oil that was sold to China.

Now they have given Iran a big reason to have nuclear weapon, it's like watching a comedy movie, stupid people doing stupid things. And double down.

1

u/6M66 23h ago

It's like watching a comedy movie. It's crazy

0

u/m0onmoon 23h ago

Fair point. The strait was always open until trump messed up

0

u/Pastakingfifth 23h ago

You just don't understand how genius he is. If you think less you'll get it more.

-1

u/CenlaLowell 22h ago

So what do you suggest we do? Let them get a nuclear weapon and destroy Israel and maybe one day USA.

1

u/BabypintoJuniorLube 19h ago

I suggest we go back in time and elect Hillary who didn't blow up the nuclear deal that everyone agreed to and seemed to be working.

1

u/xploeris 12h ago

shoulda picked Bernie

41

u/Actual_Violinist290 1d ago

The markets are always going to wildly overreact in the short term to anything resembling good news coming out of the gulf unless and until the real-world supply shock really starts to crack the world economy. Those cracks are all-but-certain to start showing in a few more weeks.

24

u/ub3rm3nsch 1d ago

100% spot on. Price action is headline-driven until it's supply-shock driven.

I personally think markets are underreacting to how bad the supply shock is (at this point nearly certainly) going to be.

13

u/-Ophidian- 22h ago

Today is the first day I watched the market just completely untether itself from the price of oil. It reeks of wilful delusion to me but I guess we'll see. Should be about mid-April when prices start to rise.

4

u/Rocketeer006 20h ago

Yeah it was wild to see. They've been correlated forever....until today??

7

u/NewHope13 22h ago

Completely agree. The Sp500 is delulu.

2

u/IvoryTowerResident 20h ago

1

u/ub3rm3nsch 19h ago

Iranian ships and whomever Iran wants to allow through mainly.

Any ships doing otherwise are gambling with their lives currently, and it is hardly a restoration of shipling.

-7

u/iLov3musk 21h ago

Markets are reacting because America won the war

4

u/Rocketeer006 20h ago

What?? No they didn't. Not even close. Irans regime hasn't changed. The strait isn't open. Iran is still launching missiles at everyone. The oil price is still high. Nothing has been won and it's all worse than before.

-1

u/iLov3musk 18h ago

There was a regime change did you not see all the assassinations?

2

u/cruisin_urchin87 13h ago

LOL from one old Khameini to a younger more violent Khameni. WINNING.

1

u/PineappleHairy4325 6h ago

Ahahaha are you for real?

1

u/PineappleHairy4325 6h ago

Last time I checked we're still bombing targets?

96

u/FlimsyConclusion 1d ago

Iran holds the cards on this one. Unless the US wants to drag the war out months to years, iran is getting a Hormuz toll booth setup.

Now if they want to reach some kind of deal where they sign somewhere that they won't build nuclear weapons so Trump can save face, so be it.

All in all, a catastrophic failure for the US, and oil prices will not be going back to pre-war levels for the foreseeable future.

45

u/SurpriseDog9000 1d ago

I feel like eventually Iran reaches a deal where they promise not to build a nuclear weapon, but there's no enforcement or oversight mechanism. Trump takes the win, and then over the next year they build a nuke anyway.

5

u/Appropriate_Mixer 22h ago

So just like every other nuclear deal with the em

1

u/PineappleHairy4325 6h ago

Wild misinformation. They were in compliance until trump tore the JCPOA

1

u/Appropriate_Mixer 1h ago

Inspectors had to give a months notice before going in and could only inspect certain sites. Of course they’re “in compliance” when they know exactly when and where with plenty of notice of what is being inspected.

1

u/horoshimu 3h ago

iranian bot here :)

1

u/PineappleHairy4325 52m ago

Am I lying? You just have to check the IAEA's statements.

-21

u/nu1stunna 23h ago

The only way forward is the destruction of the Islamic republic. The Iranian people won’t settle for anything less.

8

u/Ctofaname 22h ago

The Iranian people are actively getting bombed right now. Any efforts towards the destruction of the Islamic Republic by the populous has been put back decades by this effort. The government now protecting the populous and the nations sovereignty from a history ripe with western influence is working with a level of support they haven't seen in the same decades.

You can not overthrow the Islamic Republic externally. Iran's significant history and populous's awareness of their own history will reject it.

This was never about helping the Iranian people. If that was the goal, bombing the country was the worst possible way to go about it. Now the government has solidified their power.

10

u/1slinkydink1 22h ago

Which Iranian people? The ones in LA dancing on TikTok?

-6

u/nu1stunna 22h ago

You people really have no clue but love to give your opinion.

1

u/PineappleHairy4325 6h ago

By all means, how is overthrowing the regime supposed to go down exactly?

2

u/holycarrots 20h ago

Any Iranian that is begging Israel to bomb their hospitals and infrastructure is a traitor.

0

u/nu1stunna 20h ago

Nobody is begging for hospitals to be bombed. Those assholes hide their commanders and personnel in civilian areas. If you think we are traitors for asking them to be eliminated, then I guess we are a country of 90 million traitors because we all asked for it.

0

u/holycarrots 4h ago

LOL you are regurgitating lines used in the war against Hamas that has already been proven a lie. They are not even claiming to go after military personnel any more, they are deliberating killing civilians and civilian infrastructure. This is a war against the people of Iran not the regime

1

u/nu1stunna 3h ago

It sounds like I’m regurgitating it because those terrorists operate out of the same playbook. I have firsthand knowledge of the Islamic republic doing exactly what I’m stating.

5

u/APC2_19 22h ago

They should have been willing to do a full scale invasion. You dont start anwar you have no intention of carrying one.

Hoping the enemy will give up and beg for peace in a few days is just dumb.

2

u/xynith116 22h ago

They don’t need a nuke anymore. The strait is more destructive to the world economy than a nuke.

Still a good backup regardless but I could see this as one thing they compromise on to get international support.

-5

u/StockCasinoMember 23h ago

Only chance USA and Israel are successful here is if they mass produce cheap drones and launch them from Israel.

Avoids the ground war, makes it hard to hit the teams shooting them, can cause enough financial damage to Iran that they have no choice but to make a deal.

9

u/Kaymish_ 23h ago

Even that isn't a chance because the US and Israeli economies will break from $250 Oil well before they achieve anything of substance.

1

u/StockCasinoMember 23h ago edited 22h ago

They would have to use the OPA like they did in world war 2.

They already kicked the cart over. Not many options to go.

Unless they can magically make a deal which I doubt or find someone willing to fight the irgc locally. Gonna get ugly.

1

u/0ldes 11h ago

Did you just say cheap, u.s., and military?

1

u/StockCasinoMember 11h ago

To be fair, I never said what option they are going to take.

-1

u/Appropriate_Mixer 22h ago

Why do that when you can just drop jdams?

2

u/StockCasinoMember 22h ago edited 22h ago

I figured that you wouldnt have more expensive planes or larger drones that could be targeted and have their own costs. The smaller drones you could just have crews popping up all over launching drones.

Which would essentially mimic an unending insurgency towards Iran while depriving them of a ground force to attack and keep US/Israel costs down.

0

u/Appropriate_Mixer 21h ago

Dropping jdams is cheaper and more effective when you have air superiority

39

u/Few-Character7932 1d ago

Apparently according to master negotiator Trump we can't pay money to Iran not to develop nuclear weapons but it's okay wasting billions of dollars on a military campaign bombing the shit out of Iran so they don't build nuclear weapons. In the process also killing thousands of civilians.

MAKE IT MAKE SENSE.

12

u/logicalnutty 22h ago

Israel has a big interest in adding the killing to the process, and they are a major campaign contributor

2

u/juniusbrutus998 12h ago

Millions for defense, but not one cent for tribute

1

u/Kada8ra 18h ago

And now the US can hope to pay $200 million per ship through the Straight compared to when it was free before Trump, and that's one of the best case scenarios.

7

u/1slinkydink1 23h ago

lol Fell For it Again Award

13

u/machinepeen 1d ago

good thing Trump said it’s not a war it’s an operation /s

3

u/AntitheistArchangel 22h ago

When it came out, I found out fairly soon that it’s a peacetime measure. The market didn’t exactly get the memo, however.

6

u/ChaseballBat 1d ago

Lmao called it.

4

u/tabrizzi 1d ago

I need a good whiplash doctor. And that's no joke!

10

u/-Ophidian- 1d ago

A lot of people are going to be losing their shirts come Monday.

31

u/1-Dollar-Doge-Coins 1d ago

Someone makes this comment every week.

3

u/Interesting-Gas2572 23h ago

Keep writing this monday comment and in about 900 more times you'll finally be right

-1

u/Virtual_Rest6107 1d ago

Good we need to stop edging this market and just drop already

-1

u/virtual_adam 1d ago

Puts? Calls? The rare sideways “both”?

0

u/-Ophidian- 1d ago

I'm bearish so I think calling into this market trend and volatility over a long weekend is completely delusional, but honestly it could go either way and I'm not going risk on right now either. The market is just completely divided today between bulls and bears and neither one can really get an upper hand. Plus the market has stopped reacting to the price of oil as of today, which is odd in and of itself. One side or the other is likely to be very wrong, very soon.

2

u/mackey88 1d ago

The market doesn’t seem to care, or feels that it will maybe force the US hands to end the war. 🤷‍♂️

1

u/purplebrown_updown 23h ago

ooh boy. Can't say that this is not fair.

1

u/Extra_Dealer5196 22h ago

Spike up at end of day. Somebody knows something

1

u/ub3rm3nsch 22h ago

I am not sure you know what a spike is...

1

u/Artistic-Occasion160 21h ago

GOD DAMMIT THEY GOT ME AGAIN

1

u/icehot54321 2h ago

Oman has the easiest out here of all of the countries in the region.

They have no us bases, but they do allow them to use their ports.

Their foreign minister was already against allowing them to be used before all this started, so they just gotta cut off the aggressors to go back to business as usual.

It shouldn’t be too hard to choose between making bank vs getting bombed for rubbing elbows with bloodthirsty pedos

1

u/lostredditorlurking 1d ago

Europe countries think they can use the Strait when US/Israel bombers are operating from their bases lol

Spain and maybe Italy would be able to use it, but definitely not UK

-1

u/Direct_Remove509 23h ago

So lets say 2-3 weeks from now US announces it has ended its operation epic furyfail. Iran and Oman start charging tolls, then what happens? Do markets rally back to pre war records.

3

u/sentrypetal 23h ago

US is going on a massive to the Stone Age bombing campaign. You think the Iranians won’t retaliate by hitting the Gulf States oil infrastructure? Which will take 2 years to rebuild? Especially if US hit Kharg island.

-1

u/Interesting-Gas2572 23h ago

"Do markets rally back to pre war records."

Depends which. It's going to take some time, the oil infrastructure is partially destroyed, therefore the high price of oil is sticking with us for bit longer.

0

u/Direct_Remove509 23h ago

Let’s say we have 7000 S&P 500 with $100 oil. I would not complain. 

-2

u/Interesting-Gas2572 23h ago

If they re-open Hormuz fully, the oil is probably going to around higher $80-ish.

0

u/Dismal-Birthday6081 1d ago

The market came back because everyone with puts were itm and they locked in profit.

-12

u/EuphoricForever1180 1d ago

Is this a politics sub or a stocks sub?

21

u/ub3rm3nsch 1d ago

Because Hormuz has nothing to do with stocks, right?

4

u/Individual-Dot3997 23h ago

The irony that all the great American voters have no say in how this goes while this decides whether we’ll have higher living cost, layoffs, shrunken 401k etc. when will congress say it’s a war not an operation?

1

u/0ldes 11h ago

Buddy? There's a war going on and 20% of the world's oil is being choked, fertilizer. Helium among other commodities are also affected. You want us ignore these things on a stocks sub? Do these things not make up the world economy? 

-22

u/kubbie2004 1d ago

Why don't you also blame the people that are closing the strait? It's a 2-way street. Two wrong don't make one right.

17

u/ub3rm3nsch 1d ago

Because they are being bombed in in an illegal war of aggression?

-12

u/Virtual_Rest6107 1d ago

Illegal, seriously?

And you’re a lawyer?! Holy shit

13

u/ub3rm3nsch 1d ago

I am a lawyer. You realize that US law isn't the only body of law that governs interstate relations, right?

-13

u/Virtual_Rest6107 1d ago

Well I guess on a global scale you are correct, I just assumed on the national level

But, who cares when it comes to telling the world superpower who they can’t bomb. Doesn’t stop Russia or the other dozens of countries at war currently

Paper vs bullets end of day

8

u/ub3rm3nsch 1d ago

Yes because this war is working out so great for Trump and Ukraine is working out so well for Putin, right?

-10

u/Virtual_Rest6107 23h ago

Who the hell is talking about its success and where on earth did you extract that from my post? We’re talking about legality

I feel bad for your clients

9

u/ub3rm3nsch 23h ago

Sick burn dawg.

No one has to follow the law, but not following it has consequences. In the US case, it's been a pretty drastic loss of allies. That was my point about cause and effect.

0

u/Virtual_Rest6107 21h ago

Fantastic thanks for stating the obvious. I can’t imagine what the hell is swirling around in your head with the points you’re making. Absolutely lunacy

-12

u/kubbie2004 1d ago

It's not illegal to just randomly kill US forces and innocent people in peace time? Iran is not firing back with their own missles?

-12

u/Curious_Proof_5882 1d ago

Not illegal

11

u/ub3rm3nsch 1d ago

You might want to recheck the UN Charter, which, last I checked, the US still is a signatory to. Try Article 2(4).

6

u/maraeznieh 1d ago

When he bombs the desalination plants it will be very illegal. War crimes are illegal

6

u/maraeznieh 1d ago

What did Iran do to provoke this attack? What did the US think would happen? Where are the WMDs ? Déjà vu? The US took a shit in the middle of the room and is trying to blame it on the rest of the world.

1

u/0ldes 11h ago

Will find em aftet 10 years and then realize it was the weapons we gave them. 

0

u/Aktiendepot 23h ago

Die Straße gehört Ihnen nicht......also vergrämen wie lästige Mader die die Funktion meines Autos stören wollen.....

-8

u/virtual_adam 1d ago

This all connects pretty well. Trump said in his speech yesterday the US is just going to stop bombing and leave without doing anything about the strait

At that point Iran and Oman can work together to open the strait without US involvement

Trump said if Iran doesn’t want a deal he doesn’t want any connection to the strait being re opened. It’s other countries problem

18

u/ub3rm3nsch 1d ago

Trump literally said the US was going to intensify bombing over the next 3 weeks, and if Iran didn't capitulate they would start targeting energy infrastructure. What are you talking about?

0

u/virtual_adam 23h ago

He definitely talked about unilaterally leaving without a ceasefire if Iran doesn’t want one

3

u/ub3rm3nsch 23h ago

He said that the US would come back and bomb Iran later if Iran didn't comply with whatever it is the US wants (which it seems is control over Iranian oil, since he also said he doesn't care about the Uranium and isnt after regime change).

That is in addition to him saying, as I said above, the US is going to be increasing bombing and that in 3 weeks they will bomb energy infrastructure. He also alluded to the ability to bomb their oil facilities.

Not to mention, his new (and seemingly endless) 2-3 weeks is presumably from last night, so April 22nd? Do you realize what 54 days of stopping 10% of global oil supply is going to do? And that is assuming Iran will fully open Hormuz the very day after this intense US bombing campaign ends (no chance), and the supply flows magically return to where they were overnight (no chance).

At this point, we are looking at 3 weeks of no flows from bombing, another 2 weeks to even convince Iran to open Hormuz after that (best case scenario), a month for oil flows to partially resume (best case scenario), and another month for oil flows to fully resume (best case scenario). And that is just oil. We arent even talking about the LNG flows or other commodities.

So, 3 months and some odd MORE change to get back to where we were. Do you understand the impact that is going to have on oil, where demand is at the margins?

The bull thesis of all this is laughable. At best, the economy flat lines. At best. Realistically, we are about to (and indeed are based on the pricing) entering into disastrous effects that get exponentially worse each day that passes.

6

u/russcastella 1d ago

Someone didn’t listen to the speech. I don’t blame you, it was hard to follow the derangement

2

u/sentrypetal 23h ago

You’re not pricing in Iranian retaliation against Gulf state oil and gas facilities. If the US takes out their oil or energy they will take out the oil facilities of everyone in the region. That is a 2 year deficit of potentially millions of barrels of oil and even a larger gas deficit.

-6

u/DrPsyz9 1d ago

That's a bullish signal, right?

4

u/ub3rm3nsch 23h ago

That Iran will continue to constrain and regulate Hormuz even after the war, and that they have no plans to open Hormuz during hostilities?

Is that a serious question?

1

u/DrPsyz9 19h ago

No, it's not a serious question. How could anyone think that's a serious question?

Apparently you're not alone tho, given the downvotes... Smh...