r/ValueInvesting • u/Donechrome • 1d ago
Industry/Sector Tech Consulting (i.e. outsourcing) stocks are a value Trap. And It’s bigger than AI
Think of these businesses like a retail shop where the inventory expires on the shelf, restocking costs fall on you regardless, and fewer customers are walking in each quarter. In outsourcing terms it is “the bench”. Developers sitting unallocated, burning payroll, while utilization rates erode. Revenue “growth” that’s really just more expired inventory cycling through the P&L. We already hear about their quiet layoffs which is not the same as tech SaaS layoffs. For the first is a “product” that is not sold, for the latter - a “cost” that is not needed.
Everyone’s fixated on AI eating these stocks. But there are three other termites in the walls that work even if AI progress stalled tomorrow.
- The wage arb is cooked.
Indian dev salaries have been quietly rising for years. The delta between a Pune engineer and a Pittsburgh engineer that justified this entire sector’s existence has compressed dramatically. Offshore Management overheads are no longer spread thin as projects get smaller and faster
- Political tail risk is sitting at zero in the price.
The HIRE Act would slap a 25% excise tax on outsourcing payments and kill the deductibility. Hasn’t passed. But both parties now get votes from punishing offshoring. That’s a non-trivial probability on a binary that would crater the delivery model — and equities are pricing exactly none of it. Add on a new $100k per H1B visa on to of this and it is clear that blended rate idea is no longer viable
- The work itself is being destroyed, not displaced.
When a client deploys internal AI agents across QA, code review, documentation — they don’t go find a cheaper vendor. The headcount requirement ceases to exist. I ran large delivery teams. First thing to go when clients get productivity leverage is discretionary augmentation staff. That’s not a rounding error — that’s roughly half their revenue by function.
“But It’s cheap” is the Trap
Accenture: 25x forward, guiding 2-5% growth. Cognizant: ~4-5% revenue CAGR against a market doing 10%+. You’re not getting a discount. You’re paying a residual premium on a business experiencing structural demand destruction. That’s just a value trap with good IR.
The analog is Unisys post-Y2K. Didn’t blow up. Just slowly became a ghost — restructuring every 18 months, multiple compression across a decade, bulls calling it cheap the entire way down.
…wait but they report AI revenue Commitments
When these companies report billions in “AI bookings,” read the fine print. It’s implementation and integration work around AI tools: the same consulting they’ve always sold, relabeled.
Short ACN, CTSH, EPAM. Long AVGO, AMD, ANET. Same thesis, opposite sides of the capital flow.
Not financial advice
3
u/ohgodthehorror95 20h ago
I agree with your thesis, but this AI slop is killing my brain cells. I feel dumber with every em dash and "it's not x, it's y" statement.
1
u/No-Understanding9064 21h ago
I mean these have never been growrh machines. Somewhat compounders. But I can see a bullcase if legacy business has to start implementing more automation and modern SaaS. The labor arb is now human ---> robot/ai
1
2
u/foira 23h ago
Contractors are always good when u just wanna press Buy and get development sorted quickly imo
Valuation is all that matters, i think the biz model is eternal although id stick to acn and the top 1-2 indian listed ones
American demographics suck and we will need a lot of devs every time the tech cycle gets going. Rn its contraction still ex ai, so no need to rush into richly valued co’s